Daniel E. Macallair
Connect with Daniel
About Daniel
Macallair is a Practitioner-in-Residence and teaches courses on adult and juvenile corrections policy. He is also the Executive Director of the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice (CJCJ), a nonprofit organization founded in San Francisco, Calif. in 1986. CJCJ conducts advocacy, research, policy analysis, and program development to promote fair and humane justice policies that reduce incarceration and criminalization. As one of the nation’s leading experts on criminal justice reform, Macallair has led reform initiatives in a number of states and jurisdictions.
Contributions
In the News
Publications
Traces the history of California’s youth correctional system from the 1800s to today to explain how harsh, institutional approaches to youth incarceration developed and why they eventually began to collapse. Argues that decades of abuse, failed rehabilitation efforts, and public criticism led California to move away from large state-run youth prisons and toward more community-based approaches to juvenile justice reform.
Examines whether locking up more young people actually reduces youth crime in California. Finds that youth crime rates fell dramatically even as juvenile incarceration rates dropped, leading the authors to argue that relying heavily on incarceration is not an effective strategy for improving public safety and that alternatives focused on rehabilitation may work better.
Examines how expert witnesses—such as psychologists, social workers, and corrections specialists—can help courts make more informed sentencing decisions by providing deeper information about a defendant’s background, mental health, and rehabilitation potential. Argues that expert testimony can support fairer and more individualized sentencing, particularly when presenting alternatives to incarceration.
Examines San Francisco’s attempts to reform its juvenile justice system during the 1990s and evaluates why many of those reforms did not achieve their intended results. Argues that despite promises of rehabilitation and system improvement, inconsistent implementation, political pressures, and continued reliance on punitive practices limited meaningful change for young people involved in the justice system.
Traces the history of California’s first major juvenile correctional institution and examines how it shaped the early development of the state’s juvenile justice system. Argues that although the Industrial School was created as a reform-minded alternative for children, it quickly became harsh and abusive, helping expose the failures of institutional confinement and influencing later juvenile justice reforms in California.