Profile picture for user NinaCChristie

Nina C. Christie

Legislative Science and Technology Policy Fellow, The American Association for the Advancement of Science

About Nina

Christie's research focuses on the interplay between social connection and substance use through the lens of harm reduction. She aims for her research to directly influence drug policies and improve overall health and wellbeing among people who use drugs. Overarching themes in Christie's writings include leveraging social connection to positively influence recovery outcomes, understanding the link between opioid use and internal feelings of social connection, and how to use science to improve policy at the local, state, and federal level. Christie is a regular volunteer at the New Mexico Harm Reduction Collaborative, and is the New Mexico state lead for Stand Up For Science.

In the News

Quoted by Mo Charnot in "'Science, Not Silence'," The Santa Fe Reporter, March 8, 2025.
Quoted by Austin Fisher and Leah Romero in "NM Legislative Recap March 7: Scientists Slam Federal Grant Suspension," Source New Mexico, March 7, 2025.

Publications

"“Either Way, They Will Use. And So, Probably, Would You:” a Critical Discourse Analysis of Harm Reduction Portrayal in United States Opinion News Media" (with Nina C. Christie, Hannah A. Carlon, Hanna M. Hebden, Felicia R. Tuchman, David I.K. Moniz-Lewis, Katie Witkiewitz, and Margo C. Hurlocker). International Journal of Drug Policy 140 (2025).

Analyzes how United States opinion news media portrays harm reduction in the context of opioid use. Finds that most articles present pro-harm reduction discourse, but often use stigmatizing language.

"Listen to Young People: How to Implement Harm Reduction in the Collegiate Setting", Students for Sensible Drug Policy, 2023.

Provides institutes of higher education with the evidence-based information they need to make better policy and program choices to protect the health and well-being of students.

"Influences of Poly-Victimization on Adolescents’ Pre-Treatment Cognitive Motivations and Post-treatment Outcomes" (with Graham DiGuiseppi, Sheila Pakdaman, Daniel S. Lee, Duyen Pham, Shaddy K. Saba, and Jordan P. Davis). Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 142 (2022).

Explores how different types of victimization experiences, along with sex and cognitive factors, affect substance use treatment outcomes in adolescents. Finds that adolescents who experienced poly-victimization and trauma showed higher motivation for treatment, but lower self-efficacy and worse posttreatment outcomes.

"A Mobile-Based Pregaming Drinking Prevention Intervention for College Students: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial" (with Eric R. Pedersen, Justin F. Hummer, Jordan P. Davis, Reagan E. Fitzke, Katie Witkiewitz, and John D. Clapp ). Addiction Science & Clinical Practice 17, no. 1 (2022): 1-14.

Discusses the development of Pregaming Awareness in College Environments (PACE), a mobile-based intervention designed to prevent heavy drinking during pregaming for college students. Outlines a planned randomized controlled trial to test the app’s effectiveness in reducing pregaming, overall drinking, and related consequences over several follow-up periods.

"Identifying Individual and Environmental Predictors of Opioid and Psychostimulant Use among Adolescents and Young Adults Following Outpatient Treatment" (with Jordan P. Davis, Prathik Rao, Bistra Dilkina, John Prindle, David Eddie, Graham DiGuiseppi, Shaddy Saba, Colin Ring, and Michael Dennis). Drug and Alcohol Dependence 233 (2022).

Investigates factors that influence relapse into opioid and/or psychostimulant use among adolescents and young adults after substance use disorder treatment. Finds that both individual factors (like age, tobacco use, mental health, and criminal justice involvement) and environmental factors (such as neighborhood poverty, homicide rates, and region) significantly predict relapse risk.

"Changes in Social, Romantic, and General Life Satisfaction over the Course of a Substance Use Disorder" (with Vanya Vojvodic, Pranav Meda, and John R. Monterosso). Frontiers in Psychiatry 12 (2021).

Explores how satisfaction with social life, romantic life, and general life changes during and after substance use. Finds that those who used prescription opioids experienced the greatest drop in satisfaction across life domains during their substance use. However, in recovery, individualsregardless of their drug of choicereported similar levels of life satisfaction as those with no history of problematic substance use.

"Sex Differences in Factors Predicting Post-Treatment Opioid Use" (with Jordan P. Davis, David Eddie, John Prindle, Emily R. Dworkin, Shaddy Saba, Graham T. DiGuiseppi, John D. Clapp, and John F. Kelly). Addiction 116, no. 8 (2021): 2116-2126.

Explores individual factors for each sex that are most strongly associated with opioid use following treatment. Finds that women are more likely to relapse due to withdrawal symptoms, substance use problems, and younger age, while men are more at risk due to younger age, conduct disorder, and multiple substance use disorders.

"The Role of Social Isolation in Opioid Addiction" Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 16, no. 7 (2021): 645–656.

Explores the connection between social isolation and opioid use disorder (OUD), proposing that the brain's endogenous opioid system may explain the strong link between the two.

"The Early Impact of Social Distancing Measures on Drug Use" (with Vanya Vojvodic and John R. Monterosso). Subst Use Misuse 56, no. 7 (2021): 997-1004.

Evaluates the impact of social distancing measures during the early period of COVID-19 on substance use behaviors among those in the United States. Provides evidence that social distancing guidelines have impacted both substance use behaviors and feelings of social and physical connection.

"The Moral Foundations of Needle Exchange Attitudes" (with Eustace Hsu, Carol Iskiwitch, and Ravi Iyer). Social Cognition 37, no. 3 (2019): 229-246.

Examines how moral beliefs influence public attitudes toward needle exchange programs. Finds that opposition to these programs is most strongly linked to concerns about Purity, while support is associated with Care.