William R. Hauk
Connect with William
About William
Hauk's research focuses on international trade, foreign direct investment, economic growth, and political economy. Much of his work in the political economy of trade focuses on how political structures map into trade policy. He has also become interested in the economic policy surrounding foreign direct investment. He has been active in university administration, serving as an MBA program director and chair of his institution's curricula and courses committee. Hauk comments frequently in local and national media outlets on economic issues.
Contributions
South Carolina's Manufacturing Sector at Risk Amid New Tariffs
In the News
Publications
This study shows that, in introductory level economics classes, emailing students who are struggling early on in the semester and directing them to tutoring resources results in a significant improvement in student outcomes by the end of the semester.
Examines a common way of measuring the comparative advantage of countries -- that is, which goods that they produce relatively well and are likely to export -- called an index of revealed comparative advantage. Finds that a common form of this index has some undesirable statistical properties and proposes an alternative.
Studies patterns of economic growth from the early part of the 20th century until the 1970s and finds that poorer states had higher rates of economic growth than richer states and observes that after the 1970s, this convergence stopped. Provides some evidence that it may have slowly resumed in the 2000s.
Investigates different hypotheses about why trade policy differs between countries with legislatures elected by a plurality election rule in single member constituencies and legislatures elected by a party-list rule.
Looks at statistical issues when studying determinants of economic growth. Argues that mismeasurement of educational attainment can cause us to overlook how important it is for economic growth.
Using data on authorizations from the 2005 Highway Bill, finds that the legislative allocation of pork barrel spending by U.S. state greatly favors smaller states.