Profile picture for user MatthewBoaz

Matthew Boaz

Assistant Professor of Law, University of Kentucky
Chapter Member: Kentucky SSN

About Matthew

Boaz's scholarship is concerned with the intersection of criminal law and immigration law, critical theory, abolition, and issues related to immigration proceedings, including detention and universal representation. Prior to teaching, Boaz was a Senior Detention Attorney with the Immigrant Rights Project of the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) in Newark, NJ, where he represented individuals held in immigration detention centers while in removal proceedings. He is a graduate of Georgetown University Law Center (J.D., with a certificate in Refugees and Humanitarian Emergencies).

In the News

Quoted by Sarah R. Champagne in "Is Donald Trump Seeking to Detain or Expel His Opponents from the Country?," Le Devoir, May 2, 2025.
Quoted by Maria Ramirez Uribe in "What Evidence Does the US Government Need to Deport Green Card Holders?," Al Jazeera, March 28, 2025.
Quoted by Victoria Albert & Michelle Hackman in "What Green Card and Visa Holders Need to Know About Recent Deportations," The Wall Street Journal, March 19, 2025.
Opinion: "How to Lose a Green Card," Matthew Boaz, Lawfare, March 12, 2025.
Opinion: "A Practical Immigration Decarceration Approach for the New Biden Administration," Matthew Boaz, Border Criminologies Blog, March 19, 2021.

Publications

"The Migration of Abolition Theory" North Carolina Law Review 103 (2023).

Considers whether and how theories of abolition developed by criminal law scholars are transferrable to the realm of immigration enforcement. Identifies and illuminates a methodology adopted by critical and decarceral criminal law scholars: (i) denouncing the harms of a structural system, (ii) identifying the normative justification(s) for this system, and (iii) proposing alternatives that might better satisfy these principles.

"Speculative Immigration Policy" Georgetown Immigration Law Review 37, no. 183 (2022).

Considers how speculative fiction was wielded by the Trump administration to implement destructive U.S. immigration policy. Proposes that the harmful outcomes are not due to the use of speculative fiction, but rather the failure to consider the speculative voices of those who have been historically marginalized within the United States. Argues that radical imagination could help produce better immigration policies.

"Practical Abolition: Universal Representation as an Alternative to Immigration Detention" Tennessee Law Review 89, no. 199 (2021).

Primarily relies on a fiscal argument that has broader appeal than the typical theoretical underpinnings of an abolitionist framework. Proposes that funds that would normally fuel the immigration detention apparatus instead be reallocated to local non-profits and public defender offices. These local organizations could provide universal representation in immigration proceedings.