Profile picture for user JoshuaJansa

Joshua Jansa

Assoicate Professor of Political Science, Oklahoma State University

Connect with Joshua

About Joshua

Jansa's research focuses on interest groups; lobbying; and campaign finance; state legislatures; policy diffusion; economic development policy; and the politics of economic inequality. Overaching themes in Jansa's writings include access; influence; representation; political and economic inequality; and the content/efficacy/diffusion of public policies. Jansa serves as lead researcher on several research projects related to these themes; and joined SSN in order to bridge research and policy.

In the News

Opinion: "Sandra Day O’Connor Saw Civics Education as Key to the Future of Democracy," Joshua Jansa (with Eve Ringsmuth), The Conversation, December 15, 2023.
Opinion: "California's 'Fair Pay to Play' Law for College Athletes Has Other States Racing to Join Up. Here's Why," Joshua Jansa (with Roshaun Colvin), Monkey Cage, The Washington Post, November 18, 2019.
Opinion: "Evidence from States Shows Why Trump’s Brand of Carrier-Style Dealmaking Won’t Work," Joshua Jansa, The Conversation, January 9, 2017.
Opinion: "How States Plagiarize Interest Group Model Bills on Many Issues," Joshua Jansa (with Kristin Garrett), LSE US Centre, August 13, 2015.
Opinion: "OpenGov Voices: Transparency Needed on Corporate Subsidy Spending in the U.S.," Joshua Jansa, Sunlight Foundation, October 10, 2014.

Publications

"Athletic Competition Between the States: The Rapid Spread of Name, Image, Likeness Laws and Why It Matters for Understanding Policy Diffusion" (with Roshaun Colvin). Policy Studies Journal 52, no. 2 (2024): 451-468.

Explores the diffusion of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) policies in college athletics, arguing that their rapid adoption is driven not just by economic competition among states but also by a desire to protect or enhance athletic reputations. Findings suggest that both internal athletic characteristics and interstate competition significantly influence NIL adoption.

"The Catalysts of "Red for Ed": Statewide Teachers’ Strikes as Collective Voice and Conflict Expansion for Communities of Fate" (with Michele M. Hoyman and Austin Bussing). The Social Science Journal (2023): 1–18.

Examines teacher strikes that occurred in 2018 and 2019. Argues that declining resources for teachers and students, along with restrictive collective bargaining laws, prompted statewide mobilizations. Finds that teachers were more likely to strike in states with low per-pupil spending and limited collective bargaining power, indicating that when institutional channels for voicing concerns were ineffective, teachers resorted to mass mobilization.

"Descriptive Representation and Innovation in American Legislatures" (with Jack Nickelson). Political Research Quarterly 76, no. 4 (2023): 2018-2035.

Examines how the representation of historically excluded groups—specifically women, racial/ethnic minorities, the LGB community, and the working class—in state legislatures affects policy innovation. Finds that women's representation significantly boosts legislative innovation, enabling the early adoption of new policies, while the impact of racial/ethnic minority representation is less consistent.

"Disrupted Learning about Democracy: Instructor Strategies for Navigating Temporary Modality Shifts" (with Eve M. Ringsmuth). PS: Political Science & Politics 56, no. 2 (2023): 315-320.

Investigates the impact of temporary shifts in course modality—due to pandemics, weather, or health accommodations—on student learning in an "Introduction to American Government" class. Finds that students respond positively when instructors make course materials engaging, communicate clearly, and effectively use technology. Suggests that instructors can successfully minimize learning disruptions if there are three or fewer modality shifts during a semester.

"The Impact of Course Structure on Students’ Political Efficacy and Confidence-in-Knowledge in Introduction to American Government" (with Eve M. Ringsmuth). Journal of Political Science Education 18, no. 4 (2022): 455-475.

Examines how different course structures in an Introduction to American Government class affect students' learning about democracy. Finds that active and interactive teaching methods significantly enhance students' political efficacy and confidence, while face-to-face and online formats yield better outcomes than hybrid courses. Results provide guidance on structuring courses for effective civic education.

"Copy, Paste, Legislate, Succeed? The Effect of Policy Plagiarism on Policy Success" (with Robert M. Dorrell Jr.). Policy & Politics 50, no. 4 (2022): 605-623.

Investigates "policy plagiarism," where US state legislators copy legislation from other sources, examining its impact on policy effectiveness in organ donation, e-cigarette bans for minors, and anti-bullying laws. Findings indicate that higher levels of plagiarism correlate with reduced success in achieving policy goals, suggesting that copying text may undermine legislative outcomes.

"You Catch More Flies with Honey: An Analysis of PAC Punishment and Congressional Vote Switching" Interest Groups & Advocacy 8 (2019): 184-207.

Finds labor unions punish allies in Congress who vote for free trade agreements, but this tactic backfires by making members of Congress less likely to support labor in the future.

"Copy and Paste Lawmaking: Legislative Professionalism and Policy Reinvention in the States" (with Eric R. Hansen and Virginia H. Gray). American Politics Research 47, no. 4 (July 2018): 739-767.

Finds state legislatures that have few staff resources are more likely to copy and paste bill text from other sources. Finds this is problematic for the ability of the legislature to customize policy language to address the problems in their state.

"Captured Development: Industry Influence and State Economic Development Subsidies in the Great Recession Era" (with Virginia Gray). Economic Development Quarterly 31, no. 1 (February 2017): 50-64.

Finds states increased their economic development incentive (i.e. benefits in tax code for businesses) spending in response to the Great Recession, but most of the spending benefited Fortune 500 businesses. Finds states where businesses spent more on lobbying also tended to spend more on economic development.

"Economic Development and Infrastructure Policy" in Politics in the American States A Comparative Analysis (11th Edition), edited by Virginia Gray, Russell L. Hanson, and Thad Kousser, (CQ Press, 2017).

Presents the basics of economic development policy in the American states, specifically that the policy process in the states is dominated by wealthy businesses and, as a result, spending is skewed toward the wealthiest companies in the world.