About K. Sabeel
Rahman's research focuses on the themes of democracy, inequality, and power. His first book, Democracy Against Domination (Oxford University Press, 2017) examines how democratic ideals fueled reform movements in the Progressive Era, and what their implications might be in today's post-financial crisis debates about economic inequality. His current research extends this critique of economic power and domination to address questions about technology platforms, economic inequality, and the crisis of American democracy today.
Rahman has worked extensively with policymakers, funders, and advocacy groups in developing strategies and novel approaches to questions of democracy and economic inequality. In 2014-2015 he serves as a Special Advisor on strategies for inclusive economic development in New York City, and from 2015-2016 as a Public Member of the New York City Rent Guidelines Board. From 2013 to 2016, Rahman was the Design Director for the Gettysburg Project, an interdisciplinary initiative working with organizers, academics, and funders to develop new strategies for civic engagement and building civic capacity. In addition, Rahman is on the board of The New Press, a non-profit publisher focusing on publishing books in the public interest, and United to Protect Democracy, a legal advocacy group battling current threats to American democratic institutions.
No Jargon Podcast
In the News
Draws on the history of public utility tradition in Progressive Era reform politics to explore how we might respond to the problems of private control over shared infrastructure, from finance to internet access to online information platforms.
Offers a moral framework for conceptualizing today's inequality crisis, and a theory of social change that links law, constitutionalism, public policy and social movements, Draws on Progressive Era political thought, especially reinterpreting the dawn of the legal realist movement.
Examines the discourse of banking reform around the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. Discusses how the debate around the Act exemplifies a broader shift in discourses of financial regulatory reform, away from a previous era emphasizing the need to make concentrations of economic and political power democratically accountable, towards a new discourse grounding regulatory reform in the need to promote productive economic activity by preventing conflicts of interest and excess speculation.
Examines recent literatures and experiments in public law to develop an approach to power-balancing policy and institutional design.
Argues that these debates about the "sharing economy" are better understood as a broader normative and policy problem of updating our regulatory tools for the new dynamics of 21st century capitalism.
Provides an account of how our public philosophy has forgotten important values of democracy and economic power, and what a more democratic approach to economic regulation might look like. Draws on the history of progressive political thought and engaging debates over post-financial crisis regulation.
Discusses some of the central challenges and tensions seen, such as widening economic inequality, the persistence and increased virulence of racial and ethnic tensions, and the inability of existing political institutions to manage disputes and solve problems. Proposes some potential avenues for renewal and transformation.