Profile picture for user KerametReiter

Keramet Reiter

Professor of Criminology, Law & Society and Affiliated Faculty, School of Law; Faculty Director of UCI LIFTED, University of California-Irvine

About Keramet

Reiter studies prisons, prisoners’ rights, and the impact of prison and punishment policy on individuals, communities, and legal systems. She uses a variety of methods in her work — interviewing, archival and legal analysis, and quantitative data analysis — in order to understand both the history and impact of criminal legal system policies, from medical experimentation on prisoners, patterns of deaths in custody, and the use of long-term solitary confinement in the United States and internationally, to Scandinavian-inspired reform initiatives and staff experiences of prison culture change initiatives. She also directs the first U.C. bachelor's degree program for incarcerated students.

Contributions

No Jargon Podcast

In the News

Quoted by Shaila Dewan in "More Freedom, Less Violence: Some States Look to European Prisons," The New York Times, July 25, 2025.
Opinion: "We Advocate for Higher Education Opportunities to Those Involved in the Criminal Legal System," Keramet Reiter (with Jennifer Gomez), The San Diego Union Tribune , June 21, 2024.
Guest on ABA Journal, April 19, 2017.
Guest on Hidden Brain, NPR, April 3, 2017.
Opinion: "The Social Cost of Solitary Confinement," Keramet Reiter, Time Magazine, October 21, 2016.
Opinion: "How to Fix Solitary Confinement in American Prisons," Keramet Reiter, Los Angeles Times, October 17, 2016.

Publications

"Getting Boxed In: How Race and Gang Labeling Shape Solitary Confinement Use" (with Rebecca Tublitz, Justin Strong, Dallas Augustine, Melissa Barragan, Kelsie Chesnut, Gabriela Gonzalez, Natalie Pifer, and Justin Strong). Punishment & Society 27, no. 4 (2025).

Examines how people in prison get labeled as gang members and how that label, along with race, affects who ends up in solitary confinement and for how long. Finds that once someone is tagged as gang-involved, they are much more likely to be placed in isolation and kept there longer, with harsher effects for some racial groups even when behavior is similar.

"Opening the Black Box of Solitary Confinement Through Researcher–Practitioner Collaboration: A Longitudinal Analysis of Prisoner and Solitary Populations in Washington State, 2002–2017" (with Rebecca Tublitz, David Lovell, Kelsie Chesnut, and Natalie Pifer). Justice Quarterly 37, no. 7 (2020): 1303-1321.

Examines how prison staff decide who gets placed in solitary confinement and how those decisions are influenced by factors like behavior labels and institutional practices. Finds that classification systems can strongly shape who ends up in restrictive housing, sometimes leading to inconsistent or overly harsh use of isolation depending on how people are labeled. 
 

"'Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don't:" Perceptions of Guns, Safety, and Legitimacy among Detained Gun Offenders" Criminal Justice and Behavior 43, no. 1 (2016): 140-155.

Draws upon 140 in-depth interviews with gun offenders detained in Los Angeles County jails to examine legal and extra-legal factors that influence illegal gun possession. Findings suggest that feelings of insecurity coupled with perceptions of, and experiences with, law enforcement interact in complex ways to condition legitimacy-based beliefs, and ultimately, compliance.

"Theoretical and Empirical Limits of Scandinavian Exceptionalism: Isolation and Normalization in Danish Prisons" (with Lori Sexton and Jennifer Sumner). Punishment & Society 20, no. 1 (2018): 92-112.

Draws on interviews with 76 prisoners, 47 prison staff, and 14 experts, to document lived experiences of punishment in the Danish prison context. Argues that, regardless of “humanizing” elements of normalization and humanity, prisoners and staff may experience the power of the carceral state in Denmark in ways similar to those under more obviously harsh confinement regimes, as exist in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in the United Kingdom.

"Continuity in the Face of Penal Innovation: Revisiting the History of American Solitary Confinement" Law & Social Inquiry (2017).

Demonstrates how penal technologies that violate current sensibilities can survive, despite changing macro‐level social factors that otherwise explain penal change and practice, provided those technologies serve prison officials' internal goals.

"Crossing Borders and Criminalizing Identity: The Disintegrated Subjects of Administrative Sanctions" (with Susan Bibler Coutin). Law & Society Review 51, no. 3 (forthcoming).

Draws on in-depth, qualitative interviews that examine individual experiences in two different legal contexts: deportation regimes and supermax prisons. Identifies common legal processes of punishment experiences across both contexts. Specifically, the U.S. legal system re-labels immigrants (as deportable noncitizens) and supermax prisons (as dangerous gang offenders).

23/7: Pelican Bay and the Rise of Long-Term Solitary Confinement (Yale University Press, 2016).

Tells the history of an original "supermax," California's Pelican Bay State Prison, where extreme conditions sparked statewide hunger strikes in 2011 and 2013—the latter involving nearly 30,000 prisoners. Reiter describes how the Pelican Bay prison was created—with literally no legislative oversight—as a panicked response to the perceived rise of black radicalism in California prisons in the 1970s.