Stephen Bagwell
Connect with Stephen
About Stephen
Bagwell's research focuses on the intersection of political violence and political economy, guided by two overarching questions: are economic tools effective at promoting change in abusive government behavior, and how do economic outcomes impact the decisions and ability of groups to mobilize and dissent? Bagwell serves as a member of the Economic and Social Rights team with the Human Rights Measurement Initiative, which aims to produce metrics for government fulfillment of human rights around the world.
Contributions
In the News
Publications
Examines data from 1991-2019 to discover the effects of personalism on human rights abuses. Finds that more personalist leaders like Bolsonaro, Erdogan, and Trump increase torture and ill-treatment in their countries by weakening institutions designed to promote human rights.
Explores how sovereign debt crises impact the ability to increase respect for human rights. Finds that defaulting on sovereign debt repayment may lead to short-term improvements in respect for rights when debt payments are a large proportion of government revenues.
Examines respect for the rights to collectively bargain and workplace association and finds that increased respect for those rights lessens different types of economic inequalities, including types known to cause political violence and civil wars.
Explores how the COVID-19 Pandemic exacerbated violations of human rights in most of the 39 countries analyzed. In particular, human rights practitioners identified violations of the rights to assembly and association, opinion and expression, and political participation as particularly likely to be violated due to COVID restrictions.
Provides evidence that naming and shaming campaigns undertaken by international human rights organizations lead to a decline in sovereign credit rating, while actual human rights abuses are not.
Finds that large multinational firms are sensitive to the political risks in maintaining investments in countries which experience violence surrounding elections. Discusses they are more likely to divest from states which suffer from violent electoral processes than they are from states which experience civil war.